RE: [council] Additions to GNSO Operating Procedures

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

That would be fine Tim.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Ruiz [mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 10:04 AM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Additions to GNSO Operating Procedures
> 
> I'm not able to review the changes in context right now to know to
what
> extent we may need our SG sign-off, if any. So It would be helpful to
> have until the end of week to object.
> 
> 
> Tim
> Sent from Go Daddy Mobile Mail using my iPad!
> 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Additions to GNSO Operating Procedures
> > From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Mon, August 09, 2010 9:16 pm
> > To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >
> >    GNSO Councilors:
> >    I recently learned that, when
> >    Staff was incorporating the
> >    relevant sections of the CSG
> >    Work Team recommendations (2.1
> >    and 2.2) into the GNSO
> >    Operating Procedures (v2.0),
> >    an important explanatory note
> >    was inadvertently omitted.
> >    Appropriately, Staff did not
> >    transfer certain
> >    non-procedural content, for
> >    example, "Background" and
> >    "Executive Summary."
> >    Unfortunately, there were two
> >    sentences that should have
> >    been included; however, they
> >    were originally located under
> >    "Background" and, thus, were
> >    not noticed.
> >    What I am recommending is that
> >    the following paragraph be
> >    added immediately below the
> >    GOP Chapter 7 heading and
> >    before 7.1-Participation
> >    Rules.  It will be inserted in
> >    a shaded box as follows:
> >    [Important Note:   The
> >    recommendations in Chapter 7
> >    apply to both Constituencies
> >    and Stakeholder Groups,
> >    referred to collectively as
> >    "Groups."  In addition, with
> >    respect to this Chapter's
> >    contents, the word "should"
> >    shall be interpreted to mean:
> >     an obligation or duty to take
> >    a certain course of action,
> >    unless otherwise specified.]
> >    Would anyone object if this
> >    addition is made to the
> >    version that the Council
> >    approved on 5 August 2010?
> >    If there are no objections, I
> >    will ask Staff to update the
> >    version on the GNSO web site
> >    (http://gnso.icann.org/council
> >    /docs.html); otherwise, we
> >    will have to draft a motion
> >    and put the matter to a vote
> >    at our 26 August meeting.
> >    Thank you,
> >    Chuck Gomes