ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Gala tickets and volunteers...

  • To: "Stéphane Van Gelder" <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>, "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Gala tickets and volunteers...
  • From: Terry L Davis <tdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 06:35:33 PDT
  • Cc: HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Chuck

If you do something like that and wanted also to increase WG participation, you
could put a threshold of something like a 50% or minimum of X meeting 
attendance.


Take care
Terry



On Thu Jun 24  2:16 , "Gomes, Chuck"  sent:

>
>I wonder if there might be a way to accommodate Timâ??s and
>Maryâ??s suggestions.  What if invitations were reserved up front for all
>GNSO members who are active volunteers in the GNSO (i.e., WG members,
>Councilors, SG/Constituency chairs).  We would need to find out who of those
>volunteers are planning to be in attendance and want to attend the GALA; once
>that was done, Secretariat Staff could pick up those invitations arrange for
>pick up as feasible.
>
> 
>
>Chuck
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>From:
>owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
>Of Stéphane Van Gelder
>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 3:06 AM
>
>To: Olga Cavalli
>
>Cc: HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; MWong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Subject: Re: [council] Gala tickets and volunteers...
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>Sorry to wade in, but I find this thread surreal.
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>So should it be a rule at ICANN meetings that even if there
>are 2,000 or more attendees, as we are told is the case here, the organizers
>MUST find suitable space for them? So does that mean they have to rent a
>stadium or something if ICANN meetings continue to grow in popularity and
>interest worldwide?
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>I understand and am sympathetic to Tim's desire to include
>everyone, but what if that's not physically possible? Should a venue be
>discounted because a 2,000 person gala event cannot be organized there, either
>for budgetary or logistical reasons?
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Stéphane Van Gelder
>
>Directeur Général / General manager
>
>+33 1 48 01 83 51
>
>
>
>INDOM Noms de domaine / Domain names
>
>124-126, rue de Provence
>
>75008 Paris
>
>France
>
>0820 77 7000 (Prix d'un appel local) 
>
>De l'étranger (calling from outside France): + 33 1 76 70 05 67
>
>www.indom.com
>
>
>
>Daily domain name industry news: www.domaines.info
>
>Mon blog/My blog : www.stephanevangelder.com
>
>Twitter : stephvg
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>----------------
>
>Téléchargez l'App INDOM GRATUITE pour iPhone (App Store, Recherche:
>"INDOM")
>
>
>
>
>
>Download INDOM's FREE iPHone App (App Store, search for INDOM).
>
>
>
>
>
>http://itunes.apple.com/fr/app/indom/id359401210?mt=8
>
>----------------
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>Le 23 juin 2010 à 08:55, Olga Cavalli a écrit :
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Hi,
>
>I agree with Tim and Mary.
>
>When meetings are organized, there should be a commitment made by organizers
>and local partners  to allow everyone in the ICANN community to
>participating in social events including the Gala dinner.
>
>It is extremely disappointing to have difficulties in getting one of the
>invitations for those not part of a SO or AC, even when they volunteer time and
>effort in different working groups or are just part of the community attending
>the meeting.
>
>As new rules are being established for ICANN meetings organization, I suggest
>that we address this comment to those in charge of preparing them.
>
>Regards
>
>Olga
>
>
>
>2010/6/22 <HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>
>
>
>I strongly
>agree with Mary.
>
>Debbie
>
>
>
>Debra Y. Hughes l Senior Counsel 
>
>American Red Cross 
>
>Office
>of the General Counsel  
>
>2025 E Street, NW 
>
>Washington, D.C. 20006 
>
>Phone: (202) 303-5356 
>
>Fax: (202) 303-0143 
>
>HughesDeb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Mary Wong
>
>Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2010 10:34 AM
>
>To: GNSO Council
>
>Subject: Re: [council] Gala tickets and volunteers...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I
>agree with Tim that it seems to defeat the purpose if the most active
>volunteers at ICANN don't get an equal chance to attend the main event.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>More
>broadly, I find it troubling that these events are listed as "networking
>events" on the schedule, but occasionally (usually at meetings where there
>are very many attendees, e.g. Paris and now Brussels) an "ordinary"
>member of the community (e.g. not a Board or Council member) is
>told, after traveling to the meeting and after he/she has been
>asked to name his/her hotel for transport to the gala, that he/she needs a
>ticket on a "first come first served" basis (BTW the meeting website
>merely hints vaguely at this, saying that "Invitations will be available
>... starting on Tuesday etc.") 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>I
>appreciate that this kind of decision is made by the host/sponsor for
>logistical reasons, and not ICANN, but to me it could - and probably will - be
>taken as a poor reflection of ICANN (especially when so much volunteer time is
>being asked of the community). I also appreciate that as a Council member I get
>a ticket and in advance (thank you Glen!!!!) but if I were a non-Council but
>active WG member, I might be troubled by that too.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>It
>seems to me that if the host/sponsor cannot hold a splashy event that can
>accommodate as many members of the community as wish to attend (some of whom
>may be here for the first time or who may be funding themselves), then either
>hold a less fancy/ambitious event so that more can attend, or don't hold one at
>all (or at least don't advertise it as a gala open to all).
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>All
>right, now someone tell me this is "outside the scope of
>Council" :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Have
>a good day of meetings, everyone!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Mary
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Mary W S Wong
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Professor
>of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Franklin
>Pierce Law Center
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Two
>White Street
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Concord,
>NH 03301
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>USA
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Email:
>mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Phone:
>1-603-513-5143
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Webpage:
>http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Selected
>writings available on the Social Science Research Network (SSRN) at:
http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>>> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>  
>  
>  
>   
>    
>    
>    From:
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    "Tim
>    Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>    
>    
>   
>   
>    
>    
>    To:
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    "GNSO
>    Council " <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>    
>    
>   
>   
>    
>    
>    Date:
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    6/22/2010
>    3:00 AM
>    
>    
>   
>   
>    
>    
>    Subject:
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    
>    [council]
>    Gala tickets and volunteers...
>    
>    
>   
>  
>  
>  
>  I learned this morning that the ATRT members do not get Gala
>  tickets similar to the way the Council received them. It seems to me that if
>  the primary social event at these meetings is going to have
>  limited availability that active volunteers in current working groups,
>  work teams, etc. of the ACs and SOs should have some preference.
>  
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  
>  I'm not sure if there is anything we can do about it at this
>  point, but Glen, is there any way that at least the ATRT members can
>  be sure to get tickets if any of them want them?  And going forward,
>  this is something that should be given some thought. It may even serve as an
>  incentive for participation in the work of the ACs and SOs.
>  
>  
>  
>   
>  
>  
>  
>  Tim 
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>