AW: [council] RES: WPM Council Resolution Amendment

[<KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I second it as friendly.
 


Regards 
Wolf-Ulrich 

 


________________________________

        Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im Auftrag von Olga Cavalli
        Gesendet: Montag, 21. Juni 2010 13:53
        An: Jaime Plug In
        Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Ken Bour
        Betreff: Re: [council] RES: WPM Council Resolution Amendment
        
        
        Thanks Jaime,
        I accept this amendment as friendly.
        Regards
        Olga
        
        
        2010/6/21 Jaime Plug In <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
        

                Dear All,

                 

                According to the results of our yesterday exercise I
would like to make the following amendment to the Council Resolution on
Work Prioritization.

                 

                 

                Jaime Wagner

                ISPs Representative

                CGI (Brazilian Internet Steering Commitee)
                j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

                jaime <mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> @cgi.br
<mailto:jaime@xxxxxx>                 +55(51)8126-0916

                 

                De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Em nome de Ken Bour
                Enviada em: domingo, 20 de junho de 2010 12:14
                Para: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
                Assunto: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

                 

                GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)
                
                WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting,
adopted a resolution and timeline
<https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>  to
conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a set of
procedures (proposed Chapter 6 and ANNEX
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf> )
recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team (WPM-DT); 

                WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major
process steps the first three of which have been completed as follows: 

                1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and
delivered to the GNSO Council a recommended Work Prioritization Project
List
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-e
n.pdf>  (v1.0), including a Cover Letter
<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-p
roject-list-30apr10-en.pdf> , on 30 April 2010 [Council approved on 20
May 2010 <http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/> ]

                2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19
total) submitted individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects
(approved in Step 1) on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7
June), which were then successfully processed and aggregated by Staff
for input to Step 3; 

                3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work
Prioritization group discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and
successfully finalized a set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects
(Note:  the IDNF project was determined by the Council to be
"Ineligible"); 

                NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:
                
                RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work
Prioritization Value Ratings finalized in its group discussion session
held on 19 June 2010 and directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on
the GNSO website according to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.