[council] RES: WPM Council Resolution Amendment

["Jaime Plug In" <jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear All,

 

According to the results of our yesterday exercise I would like to make the
following amendment to the Council Resolution on Work Prioritization.

 

 

Jaime Wagner

ISPs Representative

CGI (Brazilian Internet Steering Commitee)
j@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

jaime <mailto:jaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> @cgi.br <mailto:jaime@xxxxxx>
+55(51)8126-0916

 

De: owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx] Em nome
de Ken Bour
Enviada em: domingo, 20 de junho de 2010 12:14
Para: gnso-wpm-dt@xxxxxxxxx
Assunto: [gnso-wpm-dt] WPM Council Resolution Amendment

 

GNSO COUNCIL RESOLUTION (Re: Work Prioritization)

WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 April 2010 meeting, adopted a
resolution <https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?21_april_motions>
and timeline to conduct its first Work Prioritization effort according to a
set of procedures (proposed Chapter
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/wpmg-section-6-and-annex-09apr10-en.pdf>  6
and ANNEX) recommended by the Work Prioritization Model Drafting Team
(WPM-DT); 

WHEREAS, the adopted timeline outlined four major process steps the first
three of which have been completed as follows: 

1)      Step 1:  ICANN Policy Staff prepared and delivered to the GNSO
Council a recommended Work
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/work-prioritization-project-list-30apr10-en.pd
f>  Prioritization Project List (v1.0), including a Cover
<http://gnso.icann.org/correspondence/cover-letter-work-prioritization-proje
ct-list-30apr10-en.pdf>  Letter, on 30 April 2010 [Council
<http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/>  approved on 20 May 2010]

2)      Step 2:  Eighteen Councilors and one Liaison (19 total) submitted
individual Value Ratings for all 15 Eligible Projects (approved in Step 1)
on or before 9 June (deadline extended from 7 June), which were then
successfully processed and aggregated by Staff for input to Step 3; 

3)      Step 3:  The GNSO Council held a Work Prioritization group
discussion session on 19 June 2010 in Brussels and successfully finalized a
set of Value Ratings for 14 Eligible Projects (Note:  the IDNF project was
determined by the Council to be "Ineligible"); 

NOW THEREFORE, BE IT:

RESOLVED, that the GNSO Council approves the GNSO Work Prioritization Value
Ratings finalized in its group discussion session held on 19 June 2010 and
directs Staff to publish those Value Ratings on the GNSO website according
to Step 4 of the adopted timeline.