<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Motion regarding CCT recommendations
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [council] Motion regarding CCT recommendations
- From: "Olga Cavalli" <olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 21:06:39 +0000
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:x-rim-org-msg-ref-id :message-id:reply-to:x-priority:references:in-reply-to:sensitivity :importance:subject:to:from:date:content-type:mime-version; bh=T+28Tq1tmkJhc7LdzVLKum0AjR8nvpgZLwE8TpzWxa0=; b=JQLVZCnWyTM7o28kK9a3mV6cXZWUhczn54LJvSozREOT/dxOTHKT+ycbdnMOLrQFPM 5lo+S2+DFUWQy0/t6mxOhwG68aV24QKUp1dm4+3Zolr+bZIuucgb/veR2iCiV7166b9Q L3piOVoZUIuJ47HGKobwhOBJNH0RbBoVra4Bo=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=x-rim-org-msg-ref-id:message-id:reply-to:x-priority:references :in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance:subject:to:from:date :content-type:mime-version; b=iGj0x6wkwReLTMBJmRxwIBQ8GreRy3pxcBIabhAgsMqRDSoFbXOdEVIDgbAhcGAjMO Vv8vGlMCPyssKXSjdx8WiKg2Glj8oSMpoU+OLkxL77QH2NWZTu32fzJdnm4pVDeXKH8x tC31ZHJ6SqoAFgiLujNo+xp+n40URdhVaNdt8=
- Importance: Normal
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF070349119D@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF070349119D@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- Reply-to: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sensitivity: Normal
I second this motion.
Regards
Olga
Enviado desde mi BlackBerry de Movistar (http://www.movistar.com.ar)
-----Original Message-----
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:58:57
To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Motion regarding CCT recommendations
I hereby submit the following motion for consideration in our 23 June
Council meeting under agenda item "5.2.1 OSC Recommendations from the
Communications & Coordination Work Team". A second is welcome.
Chuck
<<MOTION PERTAINING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF GNSO WEBSITE 15 JUN
2010.docx>>
RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO IMPLEMENTATION OF GNSO WEBSITE
WHEREAS, the GNSO Council, at its 21 May 2010 meeting, accepted the
deliverable of the Communications and Coordination Work Team (CCT) as
its final set of recommendations;
WHEREAS, a twenty-one (21) day Public Comment Forum
<http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-23apr10-en.htm>
completed between 23 April 2010 and 16 May 2010 and a Staff Summary and
Analysis
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/cct-recommendations/msg00004.html> has
been prepared;
WHEREAS, at its 20 May 2010 meeting, the GNSO Council postponed voting
on a motion to approve the entire set of CCT recommendations;
WHEREAS, the CCT report contains very specific technical
recommendations, developed in the summer of 2009, to improve the GNSO
Website's navigation, usability, and functionality and which have
received widespread community support and endorsement;
WHEREAS, Staff has been engaged in ongoing planning and preparatory
implementation of those aforementioned recommendations;
WHEREAS, Staff is positioned to continue its forward momentum to deliver
these much needed GNSO Website improvements expeditiously;
NOW, BE IT THEREFORE:
RESOLVED, pending GNSO Council approval of the CCT Final Consolidated
Report
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cct-consolidated-report-final-09apr10-en.p
df>, in its entirety, Staff is directed to continue implementation work
on the GNSO Website including, as planned and budgeted, the engagement
of consultants and contractors needed to perform portions of the
development.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|