<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Motion on AoC; amendment
Reminder to those who want amendments on the two motions we deferred
today: Please submit them not later than Tuesday, 15 June. Even if it
means resubmitting what you already submitted, please do so.
Thanks, Chuck
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of William Drake
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 5:03 PM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Motion on AoC; amendment
hi
On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:48 PM, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suggestion for amendment:
The 2nd "Resolved" should read: Resolved further, that the GNSO Council
should implement the Endorsement Process for all future AOC review team
selections, including the "WHOIS Policy" and the "Security, Stability,
and Resiliency of the DNS" Review Teams;
this was the the agreed objective of the DT for months...could you
clarify, why would we want to keep re-doing it? how might we make it
different it we did?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|