<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
AW: [council] Motion on AoC; amendment
1. There is concern to deeper involve the SGs in establishing the
process
2. Fixing it that way seems to be too early since we're still in a
learning process.
Regards
Wolf-Ulrich
_____
Von: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Juni 2010 23:03
An: Knoben, Wolf-Ulrich
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: Re: [council] Motion on AoC; amendment
hi
On Jun 10, 2010, at 10:48 PM, <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Suggestion for amendment:
The 2nd "Resolved" should read: Resolved further, that the GNSO Council
should implement the Endorsement Process for all future AOC review team
selections, including the "WHOIS Policy" and the "Security, Stability,
and Resiliency of the DNS" Review Teams;
this was the the agreed objective of the DT for months...could you
clarify, why would we want to keep re-doing it? how might we make it
different it we did?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|