RE: [council] Meeting Protocol for Brussels and beyond...

[Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wolf,

That must have worked well at a conference with 20% the usual participation 
level and no new DAG to bang on about...

I think it will be very different in Brussels. Hence my original email.

I would love to hear from our Chair and Vice chair on this (not you Stephane!).

Adrian Kinderis


From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2010 9:45 PM
To: stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx; william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Adrian Kinderis; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: AW: [council] Meeting Protocol for Brussels and beyond...

Stéphane,
I personally felt comfortable the way you were managing the weekend sessions in 
Nairobi which means: councillors taking seats at the table and speaking first 
to the various topics. Time for open discussion was still available and seemed 
having been taken into schedule account. I would welcome to keep it this way.



Regards
Wolf-Ulrich


________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Stéphane Van Gelder
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 2. Juni 2010 08:37
An: William Drake
Cc: Adrian Kinderis; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Council
Betreff: Re: [council] Meeting Protocol for Brussels and beyond...
Bill's summary is spot on as far as I can remember. In Nairobi, Adrian had 
pointed out the need to ensure Councillors get priority at our weekend 
sessions. As acting Chair at that meeting, I tried to do just that. My 
impression was that by allowing Councillors to speak first and then opening it 
to other members of the community, we were able to ensure that these sessions 
were productive for Councillors while still remaining open and useful for the 
larger community as well.

Stéphane
Le 2 juin 2010 à 08:20, William Drake a écrit :


Hi Adrian,

On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:24 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:


I would like to suggest that there be no questions from the floor during these 
sessions.

When we last had this conversation didn't we decide against draconian
    measures that would preclude community participation (and were hence poorly
    received by some) and for some intermediate steps like only Councilors at
    the table, chair gives preference to Councilor comments and right sizes the
    time for others, etc? If people think this has not worked sufficiently,
    wouldn't it be possible to simply have an offline conversation with the most
    relevant parties saying please respect the following ground rules, and to
    reiterate these at the outset of meetings?


On Jun 2, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Adrian Kinderis wrote:


I'll shout an extra round at the bar on Saturday night to make up for it :)

Hmm...didn't I hear something like this a few meetings ago, didn't 
materialize... :-)

BTW, on the matter of after hour amusement, perhaps I'll pass along something I 
pointed out to NCSG, might be of interest to some here:


On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 1:33 PM, William Drake
<william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> 
wrote:

Hi

Just an FYI for people who will be attending ICANN Brussels, as with Paris two 
summers ago, this meeting overlaps with the annual Fete de la Musique held 
across France, Belgium, Switzerland, etc.  Just had a look at the program 
http://2010.fetedelamusique.be/recherches?tid=&tid_1=All&city=Bruxelles and 
inter alia Saturday night 19th Toots and the Maytals is playing in the park 
near the conference site.

Bill