RE: [council] Joint Meeting Topics for Brussels

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Please see below Tim.

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-
> council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 10:26 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Joint Meeting Topics for Brussels
> 
> 
> GAC/GNSO - Are we picking one, or are they suggesting we discuss them
> all if time permits?
[Gomes, Chuck] These were just Janis's ideas. There will not be near enough 
time to discuss them all.

> If the latter, is the list in priority order? 
[Gomes, Chuck] No

> And
> either way, it would be helpful if they could be more specific on AoC,
> RAA, and IDN ccPDP. Those very broad topics. We could spend hours on
> any
> one of them.
[Gomes, Chuck] Agree.  We can narrow them down.  I think Janis was just 
suggesting possible topics that we could choose from.

> 
> ccNSO/GNSO - Agree. Numerous stakeholders have expressed concerned
> about
> how involved ICANN wants to get with this.
> 
> Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting - Will reply to this on the other
> thread.
> 
> Tim
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [council] Joint Meeting Topics for Brussels
> From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, May 20, 2010 7:18 pm
> To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> It is time for us to start thinking about discussion topics for our
> three regular joint meetings in Brussels: 1) GAC/GNSO meeting; 2)
> Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting; and 3) ccNSO/GNSO meeting.  To get
> discussion going, I listed some ideas below.
> GAC/GNSO meeting
> Janis suggested the following with my comments in parentheses:
> ·       DAG 4, including morality and public order (could be a lively
> discussion)
> ·       AoC, including A&T RT and next reviews
> ·       RAA (I believe that this is one where there is common interest
> in discussing)
> ·        IDN ccPDP (I don’t think this is very useful from a GNSO
> point of view, but maybe I am missing something)
> 
> Board/Staff/GNSO dinner meeting
> ·       There are rumblings that there are some on the Board who think
> this meeting has outlived its usefulness; in light of that, it might be
> useful to discuss the value or lack of value from both the GNSO and
> Board/Staff perspective.
> 
> ccNSO/GNSO meeting
> ·       DNS-CERT
> 
> Please comment on the above and feel free to suggest new topics.  I
> promised Janis and Chris I would get back to them.
> Thanks, Chuck
>