ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] VI WG report

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] VI WG report
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 13:42:28 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <2BC9B8DA-868F-4BED-AE4B-022262E37CA2@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <2BC9B8DA-868F-4BED-AE4B-022262E37CA2@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcrKr7c88Xiy1oEiSE6nveUVS4V7AwAAFbyA
  • Thread-topic: [council] VI WG report

Thanks for the report Stephane and thanks for serving as interim chair.

One question: did the group decide how frequently to hold meetings?

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 1:35 PM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] VI WG report
> 
> 
> Here is my report from the VI WG.
> 
> The group had its first F2F meeting in Nairobi, following the 
> council meeting, and worked on refining Obj 5.
> 
> The group then had a teleconference meeting on March 23. 
> There was consensus for the idea of having 2 co-chairs. Mikey 
> O'Connor and Roberto Gaetano agreed to serve as co-chairs and 
> I stepped down as interim chair and deferred to them.
> 
> The group has sent a list of clarifying questions to the Board.
> 
> The group agreed not to limit the number of participants.
> 
> The group was unable to finalize Obj 5. At this stage, it is 
> unclear when this item can be finalised. A straw poll will be 
> held on the list in the next couple of days to try and 
> ascertain whether consensus can be found, but council may 
> want to consider granting an extension to the WG on this item.
> 
> Please let me know if there are questions.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>