<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] 2nd topic for joint Board/GNSO dinner
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] 2nd topic for joint Board/GNSO dinner
- From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:40:13 +0100
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I would like to propose a 2nd topic for the Board dinner (I believe the custom
initiated by Avri was to have 2 topics).
As we saw yesterday from our discussions during the Council meeting, there is a
danger of staff being overloaded by the current workload. And as I pointed out,
my worry is more for us volunteers that have to balance an extremely demanding
ICANN workload, for which we are neither paid nor compensated in any way, with
our real lives and jobs. So I guess there comes a point where the question must
be asked: is a system based on so much volunteer involvement viable in the long
run, and if we want to keep the system as is (with the obvious benefits of
being truly multi stakeholder), what solutions are there to make it viable (for
example, more staff as Mike suggested yesterday)?
Thoughts?
Stéphane
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|