<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams
That should have said "response" not "request".
Chuck
________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:28 PM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams
Note the request from Janis regarding Kristina's question in today's
Council meeting.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Janis Karklins [mailto:janis.karklins@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:20 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Peter Dengate-Thrush'
Cc: 'Marco Lorenzoni'; 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; 'Cavalli, Olga'
Subject: RE: AoC A&T Review Teams
Chuck
I can speak for myself only: There have been comments that SO/AC chairs
should abstain from presenting their candidatures to the RTs.
There isn’t any formal provision which would prevent chairs to be
candidates. Especially, when the Chair of the GAC is a member of the RT ex
officio.
In order to ensure equal treatment of all Chairs, I am seriously
considering to nominate somebody to represent me in the RT. This is, of course,
subject of sufficient number and quality of governmental candidates for the RTs.
Best regards
JK
From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: ceturtdiena, 2010. gada 18. februārī 22:21
To: Peter Dengate-Thrush; Janis Karklins
Cc: Marco Lorenzoni; Stéphane Van Gelder; Cavalli, Olga
Subject: AoC A&T Review Teams
Peter/Janis,
The following question was raised in the GNSO Council meeting today
regarding your final selection of AoC A&T Review Team members: Is there any
anticipation that leaders in an SO or AC (councilors, chairs, etc.) would be
eliminated from consideration for the RT? I stated that I was unaware of any
restrictions like this, but said I would ask the two of you.
For your information, there are differences of opinion on this issue in
the GNSO.
BTW, thanks for the extension of time.
Chuck Gomes
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|