ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams

  • To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] FW: AoC A&T Review Teams
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 17:28:04 -0500
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acqw4EqEI7cx3dkMTTyuLx6Fr/vlSgAB4chwAABvp8A=
  • Thread-topic: AoC A&T Review Teams

Note the request from Janis regarding Kristina's question in today's Council 
meeting.
 
Chuck

________________________________

From: Janis Karklins [mailto:janis.karklins@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 5:20 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Peter Dengate-Thrush'
Cc: 'Marco Lorenzoni'; 'Stéphane Van Gelder'; 'Cavalli, Olga'
Subject: RE: AoC A&T Review Teams



Chuck

I can speak for myself only: There have been comments that SO/AC chairs should 
abstain from presenting their candidatures to the RTs. 

There isn’t any formal provision which would prevent chairs to be candidates. 
Especially, when the Chair of the GAC is a member of the RT ex officio. 

In order to ensure equal treatment of all Chairs, I am seriously considering to 
nominate somebody to represent me in the RT. This is, of course, subject of 
sufficient number and quality of governmental candidates for the RTs.

Best regards

JK

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: ceturtdiena, 2010. gada 18. februārī 22:21
To: Peter Dengate-Thrush; Janis Karklins
Cc: Marco Lorenzoni; Stéphane Van Gelder; Cavalli, Olga
Subject: AoC A&T Review Teams

 

Peter/Janis,

 

The following question was raised in the GNSO Council meeting today regarding 
your final selection of AoC A&T Review Team members:  Is there any anticipation 
that leaders in an SO or AC (councilors, chairs, etc.) would be eliminated from 
consideration for the RT?  I stated that I was unaware of any restrictions like 
this, but said I would ask the two of you.

 

For your information, there are differences of opinion on this issue in the 
GNSO. 

 

BTW, thanks for the extension of time.

 

Chuck Gomes 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>