<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team
Thanks Bill. I apologize if my question came across poorly. I was simply
trying to anticipate respresentation issues that might come up. Mary's
response was very helpful.
Chuck
________________________________
From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, February 02, 2010 3:16 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter
Drafting Team
Ditto Mary's explanation, the suggestion of two was not based on a SG
representation model, but rather the value-added of the different orientations
they'll bring to the table. Which, per previous, will likely mesh in important
respects with the views of other SGs rather than double representing a singular
NCSG view.
Best,
Bill
On Feb 1, 2010, at 11:18 PM, Mary Wong wrote:
Thanks to Liz and Chuck for their clarifications and
suggestions.
I agree that the DT should be reasonably small, and would in
this case personally prefer not to set numbers for each SG/SO/AC, or worry
about matching/equivalence. In other situations and over other issues, equal
representation of each group may be a fundamental concern, but in this case I
believe NCSG is recommending Avri and Milton not because we believe we (or
everyone) needs at least two (or however many) representatives. Rather, and for
the reasons that Bill has stated, Avri and Milton will best represent NCSG in
terms of what is likely to be a difficult preliminary issue (i.e. scoping out
the WG).
Cheers
Mary
Mary W S Wong
Professor of Law & Chair, Graduate IP Programs
Franklin Pierce Law Center
Two White Street
Concord, NH 03301
USA
Email: mwong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Phone: 1-603-513-5143
Webpage: http://www.piercelaw.edu/marywong/index.php
Selected writings available on the Social Science Research
Network (SSRN) at: http://ssrn.com/author=437584
>>>
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "William Drake" <william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
CC: Glen de Saint Géry<Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2/1/2010 4:33 PM
Subject: RE: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter
Drafting Team
I wouldn't see any problem with that. I just think it would be best to keep it
as small as reasonably possible because of the short timeframe and limited
task. If the CSG wants three to cover three constituencies, would you want
three? (BTW, they have not asked for three.)
Chuck
________________________________
From: William Drake [mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 4:28 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical Integration PDP Charter
Drafting Team
Chuck,
Two. There are some fundamental issues in the air about the proper
scope and terms of reference for the WG that need to be sorted out by the DT.
Even if NCSG were to resolve its internal differences on these points, there
would probably still be differences between the houses once the discussion gets
to specifics. We're dealing with a rather variable geometry of perspectives,
and as I say both people mentioned will add to working these things through.
Best,
Bill
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:09 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Bill,
How many do you think the NCSG needs for the charter drafting
team, not for the WG.
Chuck
________________________________
From: William Drake
[mailto:william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, February 01, 2010 3:59 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Glen de Saint Géry; GNSO Council List
Subject: Re: [council] Volunteer for Vertical
Integration PDP Charter Drafting Team
Hi
And from NCSG, Avri Doria and Milton Mueller.
One participant from each SG would not work for NCSG,
as we have a couple of contending perspectives in play, with multiple members
aligned with each. Avri and Milton have been very active and thoughtful
proponents of those respective perspectives, both of which overlap/synergize in
some ways with the positions advanced by other SGs. Should be an interesting
discussion...
Best,
Bill
On Feb 1, 2010, at 4:42 PM, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Glen,
Please add Brian Cute from Afilias to this DT.
Thanks, Chuck
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************
***********************************************************
William J. Drake
Senior Associate
Centre for International Governance
Graduate Institute of International and
Development Studies
Geneva, Switzerland
william.drake@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.graduateinstitute.ch/cig/drake.html
***********************************************************
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|