RE: [council] Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Olga.  I think we have a lot of work to do before we start
thinking about volunteers.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:olgacavalli@xxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf Of Olga Cavalli
> Sent: Thursday, December 31, 2009 2:32 PM
> To: Gomes, Chuck
> Cc: GNSO Council
> Subject: Re: [council] Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary
> 
> Chuck,
> Thanks for the summary.
> I think that GNSO representation is low, and we should be 
> allowed to have one representative from each of the houses in 
> the review teams.
> I would like to volunteer myself for representing GNSO in the 
> Accountability and Transparency Review Team.
> In this sense and once the plan for identifying volunteers is 
> defined, I would appreciate GNSO Council to considering this offer.
> Happy new year to all!!
> Regards
> Olga
> 
> 
> 
> 2009/12/30 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> > Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC 
> > Review Teams.  I welcome all to review it and correct any 
> inaccuracies.
> >
> > It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items 
> > regarding this both of which are time sensitive:
> >
> > 1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the 
> Council and, if 
> > so, develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan 
> meetinAccountability & 
> > Transparency Review g.  Note that comments are due the end 
> of January.
> >
> > 2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate 
> for each of 
> > the four review teams.  Because the will start early in 2010, we 
> > should start work on this right away.
> >
> > Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting:
> >
> > 7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams
> >
> > 7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal
> >
> > 7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the 
> GNSO?  If 
> > so, develop plan.
> >
> > 7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as 
> nominees for each 
> > of the four review teams?  (Next steps?)
> >
> > All - Please review the attached file and the two reference 
> documents 
> > named at the beginning of the document.
> >
> > Chuck
>