Re: [council] Draft AoC Review Teams Proposal Summary
A very good summary, thanks for going to the trouble of writing it Chuck. To me, the crucial element here is working out how we want to identify and submit volunteers. I don't see Council comments as being that important in this instance. So I think it would be good to have a chance to start our discussion on the first topic on the list, in anticipation of our next Council meeting. Stéphane Le 30 déc. 2009 à 06:27, Gomes, Chuck a écrit : > Attached is my personal summary of the ICANN Draft Proposal for AoC Review > Teams. I welcome all to review it and correct any inaccuracies. > > It appears to me that the Council has two possible action items regarding > this both of which are time sensitive: > > 1. Decide whether we want to submit comments from the Council and, if so, > develop a plan for doing that in our 7 Jan meeting. Note that comments are > due the end of January. > > 2. Develop a plan for identifying volunteers to nominate for each of the four > review teams. Because the Accountability & Transparency Review will start > early in 2010, we should start work on this right away. > > Glen - Please add the following under AOB for our 7 Jan meeting: > > 7.2.1 Draft Proposal for AoC Review Teams > > 7.2.1.1 Brief review of the proposal > > 7.2.1.2 Should the Council submit comments on behalf of the GNSO? If so, > develop plan. > > 7.2.1.3 How should GNSO volunteers be identified as nominees for each of the > four review teams? (Next steps?) > > All - Please review the attached file and the two reference documents named > at the beginning of the document. > > Chuck > <AoC Review Teams summary prepared by Chuck Gomes 29 Dec 09 for GNSO > Council.doc> Attachment:
smime.p7s
|