<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
- To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx" <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
- From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2009 11:02:11 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07AE89BE@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07AE89BE@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acpz2h/ybjVJpzMBRB6Jd0+bDgjVywAGsRoAAA4K++oAAwPSAA==
- Thread-topic: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
Chuck and all,
The Board approved GNSO Improvements Report does not require Board approval on
all GNSO Improvements-related recommendations, only on the restructuring
activities, the new PDP and the Working Group model. No Board approval is
required in this case.
Because actual implementation of the toolkit has budgetary implications, the
implementation steps for staff to take as we see them are to: 1. Determine
the cost of the services; 2. Determine what funds might be available; 3.
Prioritize the list of services; 4. Develop specifications for providing the
services; and 5. Notify the GNSO organizations of the services and
specifications.
Thanks, Liz
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, December 03, 2009 7:27 AM
To: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations
for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
Wolf,
My understanding is that the Board will need to approve the recommendations for
implementation. That was the case with regard to the GNSO Restructure
recommendations.
Rob/Denise - Am I correct on this?
Chuck
________________________________
From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: Gomes, Chuck; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu Dec 03 03:52:14 2009
Subject: AW: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations
for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
Chuck,
I'd like to second this motion but have one question regarding to the
"resolved": does "sharing the recommendations with the board.." mean that there
is no further need for board approval? In this case the council might direct
staff to execute the recommendations.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
________________________________
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 06:33
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for
GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups
I am making this motion for action in our 17 Dec 09 Council meeting.
Glen - Please post this per normal practice. Thanks.
Chuck
Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies
and Stakeholder Groups
Motion by: Chuck Gomes
Seconded by:
Whereas the Board Governance Committee Report on GNSO Improvements (BGC Report)
tasked ICANN staff with developing, within six months, in consultation with the
GNSO Council, a “tool kit” of basic services that would be made available to
all constituencies. (See Report of the Board Governance Committee GNSO Review
Working Group on GNSO Improvements, 3 February 2008 located at
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-report-03feb08.pdf,
p. 46.);
Whereas the ICANN Board approved the BGC GNSO Improvement Recommendations on 26
June 2008
(http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182);
Whereas in January 2009 the GNSO Council formed the Operations Steering
Committee (OSC) to develop recommendations to implement operational changes
contained in the BGC Report;
Whereas the OSC established three Work Teams, including the GNSO Stakeholder
Group and Constituency Operations Work Team, to take on the work of each of the
three operational areas addressed in the BGC Report recommendations;
Whereas the GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team
developed and approved Tool Kit Services Recommendations for GNSO
Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups on 25 October 2009 and sent them to the
OSC for review;
Whereas the OSC accepted the Work Team's recommendations;
Whereas on 5 Nov 09 the document was distributed to the Council list and
Councilors were asked to forward the recommendations to their respective groups
for review and comment ASAP with the tentative goal of Council action in our
December meeting;
RESOLVED, the Council accepts the recommendations
(http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso-05nov09-en.pdf)
and directs Staff to share the recommendations with the Board and post the
document on the GNSO web page at http://gnso.icann.org/.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|