Re: AW: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wolf,

My understanding is that the Board will need to approve the recommendations for 
implementation. That was the case with regard to the GNSO Restructure 
recommendations. 

Rob/Denise - Am I correct on this?

Chuck


________________________________

From: KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx <KnobenW@xxxxxxxxxx> 
To: Gomes, Chuck; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Thu Dec 03 03:52:14 2009
Subject: AW: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations 
for GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups 


Chuck,
 
I'd like to second this motion but have one question regarding to the 
"resolved": does "sharing the recommendations with the board.." mean that there 
is no further need for board approval? In this case the council might direct 
staff to execute the recommendations.
 
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich

 

________________________________

Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von Gomes, Chuck
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 3. Dezember 2009 06:33
An: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Betreff: [council] Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for 
GNSO Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups


I am making this motion for action in our 17 Dec 09 Council meeting.
 
Glen - Please post this per normal practice.  Thanks.
 
Chuck
 
Motion To Approve Tool Kit of Services Recommendations for GNSO Constituencies 
and Stakeholder Groups

 

Motion by: Chuck Gomes
Seconded by: 

 

Whereas the Board Governance Committee Report on GNSO Improvements (BGC Report) 
tasked ICANN staff with developing, within six months, in consultation with the 
GNSO Council, a “tool kit” of basic services that would be made available to 
all constituencies.  (See Report of the Board Governance Committee GNSO Review 
Working Group on GNSO Improvements, 3 February 2008 located at 
http://www.icann.org/en/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-report-03feb08.pdf,
 p. 46.);

 

Whereas the ICANN Board approved the BGC GNSO Improvement Recommendations on 26 
June 2008 (http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182 
<http://www.icann.org/en/minutes/resolutions-26jun08.htm#_Toc76113182> );

 

Whereas in January 2009 the GNSO Council formed the Operations Steering 
Committee (OSC) to develop recommendations to implement operational changes 
contained in the BGC Report;

 

Whereas the OSC established three Work Teams, including the GNSO Stakeholder 
Group and Constituency Operations Work Team, to take on the work of each of the 
three operational areas addressed in the BGC Report recommendations; 

 

Whereas the GNSO Stakeholder Group and Constituency Operations Work Team 
developed and approved Tool Kit Services Recommendations for GNSO 
Constituencies and Stakeholder Groups on 25 October 2009 and sent them to the 
OSC for review;

 

Whereas the OSC accepted the Work Team's recommendations;  

 

Whereas on 5 Nov 09 the document was distributed to the Council list and 
Councilors were asked to forward the recommendations to their respective groups 
for review and comment ASAP with the tentative goal of Council action in our 
December meeting;

 

RESOLVED, the Council accepts the recommendations 
(http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso-05nov09-en.pdf
 
<http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/tool-kit-services-recommendations-for-gnso-05nov09-en.pdf>
 ) and directs Staff to share the recommendations with the Board and post the 
document on the GNSO web page at http://gnso.icann.org/ 
<http://gnso.icann.org/> .