RE: [council] NCA Assignments

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was sleeping when you sent this Avri; if not, I would have responded.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2009 5:06 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] NCA Assignments
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have not heard from any of the other SG representative on 
> the subject of NCA assignment.
> 
> I will run the lottery shortly unless I hear that people have 
> reached agreement.
> 
> Using alphabetical order for the picks, the names will be ordered:
> 
> 1. Olga
> 2. Terry
> 
> Using alphabetical order for the assignments,
> 
> 1st name picked goes to Contracted Parties House 2nd name 
> picked goes to Non Contracted Parties House
> 
> thanks
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 8 Oct 2009, at 00:53, Avri Doria wrote:
> 
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Thanks Kristina.
> >
> > Assuming the NCSG agrees, it remains for the Contracted 
> Parties House 
> > to agree or not to the assignment of Andrei.  If they do, I 
> assume the 
> > assignment of Olga as the non voting just falls out.
> >
> > I am in the UK, and about to go to sleep after a longs 
> day's flight.  
> > I will hold off running the random selection until I hear back from 
> > folks tomorrow.
> >
> > a.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7 Oct 2009, at 16:08, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> >
> >> All,
> >>
> >> On behalf of the Commercial Stakeholder Group, I write to 
> advise that 
> >> Terry's preference to be assigned to the Non-Contracted 
> Parties House 
> >> is acceptable to us.  I communicated this information yesterday to 
> >> the NCSG point person on the issue.  As no other SG has yet posted 
> >> any assignment-related information, we are posting to the Council 
> >> list in the hope of facilitating Council completion of the 
> assignment 
> >> process in the previously agreed upon timeframe.
> >>
> >> K
> >>
> >
> >
> 
>