ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] ICANN Comment periods due soon after Seoul

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] ICANN Comment periods due soon after Seoul
  • From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:03:24 -0400
  • Cc: Cheryl Langdon-Orr <langdonorr@xxxxxxxxx>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


In reviewing open ICANN comment periods with the ALAC officers today, we were somewhat taken aback by the number and importance of ICANN comment periods that had just opened in the last several days and are scheduled to end soon after the Seoul meeting.

Posted 01 Oct,  Due 01 Nov,   Expedited Registry Security Request (ERSR)
Posted 02 Oct, Due 06 Nov, Domain Names Registered Using a Privacy or Proxy Service
Posted 05 Oct,  Due 04 Nov,   NomCom Review ­ Draft Working Group Report
Posted 05 Oct,  Due 04 Nov,   SSAC Review ­ Draft Working Group Report
Posted 05 Oct,  Due 04 Nov,   Board Review ­ Draft Final Working Group Report

Although we seemed to recall that a commitment had been made to not "count" the time during an ICANN meeting against one month comment periods, that is clearly not being done here. For the Seoul meeting, many of us will spend 7-8 business days in transit or at the meeting, significantly cutting into the time available to comment.

And we noted that although all of these topics are quite important, only the ERSR one could really be viewed as very time-sensitive.

The ALAC will likely request a 2 week extension on all five comment periods. The GNSO Council may wish to consider a similar move.

Alan






<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>