ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] DAG v3

  • To: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] DAG v3
  • From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:06:37 -0400
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcpDqxHFWO0DFxmfSSm/RLIc8kn8LwAAYsQv
  • Thread-topic: DAG v3

I was assuming October 2, which meets the Board's 15-business-day deadline. The 
folks in MdR have another 9 hours of October 2 left.

As for celebrating, don't get me started. My office is 2 blocks from the W and 
ICANN couldn't be bothered to invite me to the party they had there last night. 
(A fellow IPC member sent me his invite.)


Kristina Rosette 
Covington & Burling LLP 
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 
Washington, DC 20004-2401 
voice: 202-662-5173 
direct fax: 202-778-5173 
main fax: 202-662-6291 
e-mail: krosette@xxxxxxx 

This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is 
confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, 
please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been 
inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system. Thank 
you for your cooperation. 

Sent from my Wireless Handheld 


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Sent: Fri Oct 02 17:55:35 2009
Subject: [council] DAG v3 

Is it just me or were we expecting the DAV v3 by September 30?


In recent communications (Peter’s letter to the GAC for example) this was the 
date quoted.


Whilst I am not too bothered by the delay what does concern me is that ICANN 
staff have simply left us in the dark as to the progress.


If ICANN knew it was going to be late why not make an announcement to clarify? 
Why keep us guessing?


Very frustrating for the Community for which they serve.


Perhaps they were too busy celebrating with the US Government to care? 


Is it [possible to request a response from staff?


Adrian Kinderis


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>