<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Topic for next Agenda was Re: [] Incoming Council members
We could expand that to include all four over arching issues.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:51 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] Topic for next Agenda was Re: []
> Incoming Council members
>
>
>
> (apologies for piecemeal response)
>
> For the Board-GNSO-Staff dinner, I would like to add the
> Mitigating Malicious Conduct measures that were previewed in
> the webinar earlier today.
>
> K
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 1:29 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Topic for next Agenda was Re: [] Incoming
> Council members
>
>
> Hi,
>
> In terms of that agenda, I currently see two dominant issues:
>
> 1. Discussion of the contents of the yet to be approved
> letter form the Board to the GNSO asking for the GNSO to do
> some work related to the DAG and the IRT recommendations.
>
> 2. Any issues that still need to be dealt with in terms of
> completing the transition/restructuring. E.g. the assignment
> of NCAs to houses if that has not been completed yet
> (completion date is listed as 7
> Oct) or any other issue that is pending.
>
> The agenda will come out this Thursday. If anyone on the
> council has any issues they think also need to be covered,
> please let me know.
>
> Also in terms of the Board-GNSO-Staff Diner topic - I am
> thinking that the contents of the yet to be seen letter might
> be just the thing. Does this sound reasonable? Any other
> suggestions?
>
> I am also thinking that this letter should be on the
> Wednesday Public Meeting agenda.
>
> thanks
> a.
>
>
> On 29 Sep 2009, at 12:46, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
> > I am anticipating that our agenda may be shorter than usual
> so I think
> > that it would be good if we have an agenda item at the beginning to
> > welcome the new Councilors and an agenda item at the end
> allowing them
> > to ask questions if they have any and if time permits. Other than
> > that it is probably best that the new Councilors are there as
> > observers unless there is a discussion topic that specifically
> > involves them.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> >> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2009 11:43 AM
> >> To: Council GNSO
> >> Subject: Re: [council] Incoming Council members was Re: []
> NCA input
> >> to House placement
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Sorry if i was unclear. i was suggesting that they be there as
> >> observers.
> >> But I was not explicit in the part I wrote for that
> message, only in
> >> the part I included from a previous message.
> >>
> >> BTW, 'as observers' normally means, in a GNSO context,
> that they can
> >> participate just not vote or make motions.
> >>
> >> a.
> >>
> >> On 29 Sep 2009, at 11:35, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
> >>
> >>> I object to them joining as Councillors.
> >>>
> >>> They should be there as observers only.
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>> On 30/09/2009, at 1:14, "Stéphane Van Gelder"
> >>> <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxx
> >>> m> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Seems fine to me.
> >>>>
> >>>> Stéphane
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Le 29/09/09 15:26, « Avri Doria » <avri@xxxxxxx> a écrit :
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 29 Sep 2009, at 08:32, Avri Doria wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I should mention that Andrey has been added to this
> list (as all
> >>>>>> newly appointed/elected council members will be), and
> I welcome
> >>>>>> him. Of course the incoming council members are
> >> observers on the
> >>>>>> list until 28 October. In keep with our normal
> >> processes, I invite
> >>>>>> the new council members to participate on the list as
> >> fully as they
> >>>>>> feel ready to with voting and the making of motions
> >> being the only
> >>>>>> exceptions.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I would like to suggest that incoming council members also be
> >>>>> invited to join the next Council call on on 8 October.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Since this is not part of the normal process, I want to
> >> confirm that
> >>>>> there are no objections.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks
> >>>>>
> >>>>> a.
> >>>>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|