<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] GNSO Council resolutions 24 September 2009
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 24 September 2009
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 05:51:02 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Aco9a9HS1Lwh2ip4Q6GTQaAbqVMXYQAAYy1wALJhvJA=
- Thread-topic: GNSO Council resolutions 24 September 2009
Dear Councillors,
Ahead of the complete minutes, please find the motions passed by the GNSO
Council at the meeting on Thursday, 24 September 2009.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
1. Motion Requesting an Issues report on vertical Integration and
Registry/Registrar cross-ownership
Motion proposed by Mary Wong and seconded by Philip Sheppard
Whereas, Recommendation 19 of the GNSO policy authorizing the new gTLD process
states: "Registries must use only ICANN accredited registrars in registering
domain names and may not discriminate among such accredited registrars;"
Whereas, opening up the market to many new TLD operators may call into question
some of the assumptions on which the separation of registry and registrar
functions is based;
Whereas, economic research commissioned by ICANN staff also suggests that
changes in these assumptions might be justified;
Whereas, the new gTLD policies passed by the Council do not provide any
guidance regarding the proper approach to cross ownership and vertical
integration, but instead implicitly suggest that the status quo be left in
place;
Resolved: the GNSO Council hereby requests the preparation of an Issues Report
for delivery within 45 days on future changes in vertical integration and
cross-ownership between gTLD registrars and registries, to assist in
determining whether a PDP should be initiated regarding what policies would
best serve to promote competition and to protect users and registrants.
Council votes in favour: 11 votes
Live Council votes: Philip Sheppard, Zahid Jamil, Kristina Rosette, Cyril Chua,
Tony Harris, Maggie Mansourkia, Mary Wong, William Drake, Olga Cavalli (one
vote each)
Terry Davis and Mike Rodenbaugh - absentee ballots (one vote each)
Council votes against: 6 votes
Live Council votes: Tim Ruiz, Stéphane van Gelder (two votes each)
Adrian Kinderis - absentee ballot (two votes each)
Four Councillors abstained (7 votes):
Live Council Abstentions: Chuck Gomes, Edmon Chung, (two votes each) Avri Doria
(one vote)
Jordi Iparraguirre - absentee ballot (two votes)
Three Councillors did not vote:
Carlos Souza, Ute Decker, Tony Holmes (one vote each)
Reasons for abstentions: Chuck Gomes and Edmon Chung
"I want to thank Kristina and the IPC for the good amendments that were
accepted as friendly by the NCUC. The Registry constituency does not want to
abstain because of the amendments, they have not had enough time to comment on
them yet. The constituency had previously made a decision on the original
motion to abstain and because there has not been enough time to obtain feedback
on the amended motion, Edmon Chung and I are going to abstain.
The reason for the abstention has little to do with the request in the motion,
except for the fact that even though the motion requests that any PDP not
affect the timing of the new gTLDs, we think it would be highly unlikely that
it would not have an impact on the launch of new TLDs, and because there could
be misperceptions with regard to existing Registries doing anything that might
cause delays and thinking that we are fearful of competition, we want to avoid
that possible perception."
Reason for abstention : Jordi Iparraguirre
"I'm abstaing for the same reason as Chuck and Edmon. Our vote in the GNSO
follows the decisions taken by our constituency, and we had no time to discuss
it."
Reasons for abstention: Avri Doria
Due to CSG concerns about the ethics of my decision to join the NCUC and about
the propriety of my continuing to vote as an NCA, I abstain from all votes in
the council until such time as the Board Structural Improvements Committee
decides on the disposition of the CSG letter of concern. I do this so that
there can be no later dispute concerning policy decisions of the GNSO council
based on questions about my status.
2. Amendment to Motion to Approve Plan for Bicameral Council Seat
Transition
Motion made by Chuck Gomes on 23 September 2009 and seconded by Mary Wong
In the following Motion to Approve Plan for Bicameral Council Seat Transition
originally submitted on 15 September and amended on 17 September, add the
following to step 9 of the Plan: "As the first substantial item on the agenda
of 28 October, the new council members will discuss and vote on the updated
Council Operating Procedures. Approval of the Procedures will require a
majority of the voting members of each house for approval. Any amendment that
results from comments submitted, will need to be voted on prior to the vote on
the Procedures and will also require a majority of the voting members of each
house."
2 a. Motion to Approve Plan for Bicameral Council Seat Transition
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/amended-motion-bicameral-council-seat-transition-plan-17sep09-en.htm
The amendment and the motion passed by voice vote.
Councillors present at the time of the vote:
Philip Sheppard, Zahid Jamil, Kristina Rosette, Cyril Chua, Tony Harris, Maggie
Mansourkia, Mary Wong, William Drake, Tim Ruiz, Stéphane van Gelder, Edmon
Chung, Chuck Gomes, Olga Cavalli.
One abstention - Avri Doria, Nominating Committee Appointee (NCA)
Avri Doria was referred to in the motion and thus abstained from voting.
3. Council reached consensus and the Draft GNSO Council Operating
Procedures will be posted for Public Comment along with the amendment which was
modified to include comments with the document noting the issues with regard to
counting of abstention votes and noting that additional work may be needed on
that.
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/public-comment-draft-17sep09-en.pdf
4. The GNSO Council Motion to approve Internationalized Registration Data
Working Group Charter
Motion proposed by Chuck Gomes seconded by Philip Sheppard.
Whereas:
* There have been increasing community concerns that the current
WHOIS service is deficient in a number of ways, including technical areas as
noted in recent SSAC reports, such as accessibility and readability of WHOIS
contact information in an internationalized domain name (IDN) environment.
* On 21 April 2009, the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory
Committee (SSAC) published a report titled SAC037 "Display and usage of
Internationalized Registration Data" (SAC037) located at
http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac037.pdf.
* On 26 June 2009 the ICANN Board approved a resolutionrequesting
that the GNSO and SSAC, in consultation with staff, convene an
Internationalized Registration Data Working Group (IRD WG) comprised of
individuals with knowledge, expertise, and experience in these areas to study
the feasibility and suitability of introducing display specifications to deal
with the internationalization of Registration Data.
* In the 26 June resolution, the Board directs the Internationalized
Registration Data Working Group to solicit input from interested constituencies
including ccTLD operators and the ccNSO during its discussions to ensure broad
community input.
* ICANN Staff in cooperation with members of the GNSO Council and
SSAC developed a draft charter for said working group as attached.
The GNSO Council:
* Approves the IRD WG draft charter, and
* Encourages GNSO constituencies, stakeholder groups and other GNSO
participants to identify possible participants of the IRD WG with knowledge,
expertise, and experience in these areas to study the feasibility and
suitability of introducing display specifications to deal with the
internationalization of Registration Data.
Internationalized Data Registration WG Draft Charter 15 Sep 09.doc
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/internationalized-data-registration-wg-draft-charter-27sep09.pdf
The motion was passed by voice vote.
Councillors present at the time of the vote:
Philip Sheppard, Kristina Rosette, Cyril Chua, Tony Harris, Maggie Mansourkia,
Mary Wong, William Drake, Tim Ruiz, Stéphane van Gelder, Chuck Gomes, Olga
Cavalli.
One abstention - Avri Doria, Nominating Committee Appointee (NCA)
Avri Doria stated the following reason for abstaining
Due to CSG concerns about the ethics of my decision to join the NCUC and about
the propriety of my continuing to vote as an NCA, I abstain from all votes in
the council until such time as the Board Structural Improvements Committee
decides on the disposition of the CSG letter of concern. I do this so that
there can be no later dispute concerning policy decisions of the GNSO council
based on questions about my status.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|