RE: [council] Motion to approve Internationalized Registration Data Working Group Charter

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Chuck. Both look correct.

Tim

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Motion to approve Internationalized Registration
Data Working Group Charter
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, September 16, 2009 2:50 pm
To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
"GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Tim,

Please check to make sure I made the amendments correctly both in the
attached file and on the wiki.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gomes, Chuck 
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 3:27 PM
> To: Tim Ruiz; GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Motion to approve Internationalized 
> Registration Data Working Group Charter
> 
> Yes Tim. I would accept that as a friendly amendment. In 
> Whereas clause I mainly too statements from other documents. 
> I actually wondered about this one but decided to leave it in 
> tact for the first cut.
> 
> Chuck 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 1:46 PM
> > To: GNSO Council
> > Subject: RE: [council] Motion to approve Internationalized 
> > Registration Data Working Group Charter
> > 
> > Thanks Chuck. Would accept the attached amendments as friendly? It 
> > removes the "data accuracy and reliability"
> > terminology. That keeps it focused on the issue at hand and lessens 
> > the chance that the WG gets off on non-related issues.
> > 
> > Tim
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [council] Motion to approve Internationalized Registration 
> > Data Working Group Charter
> > From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Tue, September 15, 2009 1:26 pm
> > To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > I would like to submit the attached motion for 
> consideration at our 
> > 24 Sep 09 GNSO Council meeting. Note that it is also posted on the 
> > GNSO wiki at 
> > https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?24_sept_motions.
> > 
> > Chuck Gomes
> > 
> > 
> > GNSO Council Motion to approve Internationalized Registration Data 
> > Working Group Charter
> > 
> > 15 Sep 09
> > 
> > Whereas:
> > There have been increasing community concerns that the 
> current WHOIS 
> > service is deficient in a number of ways, including data 
> accuracy and 
> > reliability, as well as in other technical areas noted in 
> recent SSAC 
> > reports, such as accessibility and readability of WHOIS contact 
> > information in an internationalized domain name (IDN) 
> environment. On 
> > 21 April 2009, the ICANN Security and Stability Advisory Committee 
> > (SSAC) published a report titled SAC037 "Display and usage of 
> > Internationalized Registration Data" (SAC037) located at 
> > http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac037.pdf. On 26 
> June 2009 
> > the ICANN Board approved a resolution requesting that the GNSO and 
> > SSAC, in consultation with staff, convene an Internationalized 
> > Registration Data Working Group (IRD WG) comprised of 
> individuals with 
> > knowledge, expertise, and experience in these areas to study the 
> > feasibility and suitability of introducing display 
> specifications to 
> > deal with the internationalization of Registration Data. In the 26 
> > June resolution, the Board directs the Internationalized 
> Registration 
> > Data Working Group to solicit input from interested constituencies 
> > including ccTLD operators and the ccNSO during its discussions to 
> > ensure broad community input.
> > ICANN Staff in cooperation with members of the GNSO Council 
> and SSAC 
> > developed a draft charter for said working group as attached.
> > 
> > 
> > The GNSO Council:
> > Approves the IRD WG draft charter, and Encourages GNSO 
> > constituencies, stakeholder groups and other GNSO participants to 
> > identify possible participants of the IRD WG with knowledge, 
> > expertise, and experience in these areas to study the 
> feasibility and 
> > suitability of introducing display specifications to deal with the 
> > internationalization of Registration Data.
> >