ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Regarding topics for open discussion amongst SOs and ACs

  • To: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Regarding topics for open discussion amongst SOs and ACs
  • From: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 17:56:34 +0200
  • Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <20090903084910.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.e3689bf643.wbe@email.secureserver.net>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcosrxxZ9TjUEuuZ20OKdPDF5+lCyw==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Regarding topics for open discussion amongst SOs and ACs
  • User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605

I agree with Tim that there are already a lot of opportunities to discuss
new gTLDs elsewhere, and that we may want to focus on other topics here.

Stéphane


Le 03/09/09 17:49, « Tim Ruiz » <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Thanks Avri. I know that new gTLD issues weigh heavy on everyones'
> minds and these issues will no doubt continue to be the focus of
> much of what goes on in Seoul. But accountability is also a long
> term issue that a significant portion of the community clearly
> feels has not been resolved. We need to begin getting organized
> across the ACSO structure to address it.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [council] Regarding topics for open discussion amongst SOs
> and ACs
> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, September 03, 2009 10:03 am
> To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> Several variants of the topic have been suggested. I have not brought
> the accountability topic back to the ACSO chairs yet. Will bring info
> back after out meeting later tonight (UTC).
> 
> 
>> Will the introduction of new gTLDs provide potential benefits to
>> consumers that will outweigh any potential harm?
>> 
>> Which could also be phrased as a more general question:
>> 
>> What are the remaining impediments to finalising the new gTLD
>> application process and what can be done to resolve them?
>> 
>> Or a little more broadly still
>> 
>> What are the remaining impediments to finalising the new gTLD and
>> IDN Fast Track processes and what can be done to resolve these issues?
>> 
> 
> a.
> 
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>