Re: [council] Re: [offlist] Status/report from ACSO meeting

[Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Avri,
were there other additional topics proposed?
This one proposed by GAC is already chosen as the only topic?
thanks
Olga

2009/9/1 Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>

>
> Hi,
>
> while not the same words, pretty much what i said.
> but i promised to report it in a neutral manner.
>
> GAC is being rather insistent.
> they say it covers all the topics they think are interesting.
>
> the pretty much refused (not in so few words) to hold the meeting on a
> Monday
> unless they felt the topic was one of interest to them.
>
> i figured the GNSO was fine with not having the meeting at all and said so.
> but also said that the GNSO was not proposing that the meeting be
> cancelled.
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 2 Sep 2009, at 00:14, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
>
>  Should be an interesting and diverse debate but it will come down to one
>> side's opinions versus the other's.  Isn't that basically where we
>> started in the New gTLD PDP process?
>>
>> Chuck
>>
>>  -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 6:04 PM
>>> To: Council GNSO
>>> Subject: [council] Status/report from ACSO meeting
>>>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Just got out of a ACSO meeting where the topic of the meeting
>>> for Seoul was discussed.
>>>
>>> The GAC has suggested that the Seoul ACSO meeting focus on a
>>> topic from their letter to the Board Chair of 18 Aug 09.
>>> http://www.icann.org/correspondence/karklins-to-dengate-thrush
>>> -18aug09-en.pdf
>>>
>>> Specially based on the following sentence:
>>>
>>> "The GAC remains concerned that the threshold question has
>>> not been answered whether the introduction of new gTLDs
>>> provides potential benefits to consumers that will not be
>>> outweighed by the potential harms."
>>>
>>> So the topic would be:
>>>
>>> Whether the introduction of new gTLDs provides potential
>>> benefits to consumers that will not be outweighed by the
>>> potential harms
>>>
>>> We have all been asked to get feedback from the various SOs
>>> and ACs before next week.
>>>
>>> I have also reported this under the status section of the
>>> Agenda for this week.
>>>
>>> a.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Olga Cavalli, Dr. Ing.
www.south-ssig.com.ar