ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:00:12 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3DED7882A1@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <28D6A79E-5C8F-4A84-B967-7FA595F37AA7@acm.org> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3DED788265@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702C7268A@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3DED7882A1@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 14 Aug 2009, at 08:44, Adrian Kinderis wrote:

Would it be inappropriate for every Councillor to declare if they or the organisation they work for has not ever been remunerated for work, received a benefit, or invoiced another organisation for an ICANN (i.e. domain name) related or DNS related issue.

I think that essentially this sort of information should already be contained in everyones SOI statement. If not they should consider updating the statement.

Again, it is not the practice, or in the procedures, to ask these sort of questions before each and every vote - the assumption is that each council member will mind their own conflicts ad do the right thing. If however, you think that this sort of thing should be the norm, it would probably be good to recommend it to the OSC Council Operations WT.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>