<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:00:12 -0400
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3DED7882A1@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <28D6A79E-5C8F-4A84-B967-7FA595F37AA7@acm.org> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3DED788265@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702C7268A@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB3DED7882A1@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On 14 Aug 2009, at 08:44, Adrian Kinderis wrote:
Would it be inappropriate for every Councillor to declare if they or
the organisation they work for has not ever been remunerated for
work, received a benefit, or invoiced another organisation for an
ICANN (i.e. domain name) related or DNS related issue.
I think that essentially this sort of information should already be
contained in everyones SOI statement. If not they should consider
updating the statement.
Again, it is not the practice, or in the procedures, to ask these sort
of questions before each and every vote - the assumption is that each
council member will mind their own conflicts ad do the right thing.
If however, you think that this sort of thing should be the norm, it
would probably be good to recommend it to the OSC Council Operations WT.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|