ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda
  • From: Adrian Kinderis <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 16:59:57 +1000
  • Accept-language: en-US, en-AU
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US, en-AU
  • In-reply-to: <28D6A79E-5C8F-4A84-B967-7FA595F37AA7@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <28D6A79E-5C8F-4A84-B967-7FA595F37AA7@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acobam028hjs5CcVT5Wq4KSNVewJPgBQcZNA
  • Thread-topic: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda


I propose that if and when this motion is made that all Councillors that may 
not be continuing on the new Council due to the reorganisation abstain from 
voting as they are significantly conflicted. That is; they are effectively 
voting for their own free trip to ICANN.


Adrian Kinderis

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, 13 August 2009 2:31 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Additional topic and motion for this weeks agenda


Since I was not able to send the proposed letter on increased travel  
support due to the absence of consensus, I have added it as an AOB  
topic to the agenda and have included a possible motion.  Since this  
letter has been on the table and list for consensus consideration for  
over 2 weeks, I hope that it is acceptable to put it forward for this  
week's meeting.

the motion (as yet not made or seconded):

Motion made by:

Seconded by:


The plan is to seat the new council in Seoul,

and current council members may not longer be council members at that  


Send the following letter:

Letter to Kevin Wilson,

I have been mandated by the GNSO council, by a vote of XX to YY, to  
request support not only for the members of the new bi-cameral council  
to be seated at Seoul, but also for those current council members who  
may not be continuing on the new council due to the reorganization.

The reason this request is being made is to provide continuity to the  
GNSO council at this time of restructuring, reorganization and  

Thank you
Avri Doria
for the GNSO Council



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>