ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:11:58 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <E129E200EA6742FAA717E89FDEB35439@PSEVO>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7AE0DAA5467@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> <E129E200EA6742FAA717E89FDEB35439@PSEVO>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


While I appreciate the value of written status updates and agree that it would be good to have them I wonder whether they actually will save time. For people who read them, it will give them a chance to think through the status and have better questions - and this is a good effect. Yet there will always be people who did not have a chance to read them, so I believe we will still need to ask for a verbal report in most cases.


On 10 Aug 2009, at 07:57, Philip Sheppard wrote:

In the interest of time could we pursue the suggestion of Chuck (not for the first time) that basic status reports are provided in advance of the meeting in writing and subject to a Q and A at the meeting if any one has a question?

This would give time for the more pertinent updates on structure and charters
which will need to be discussed.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>