<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Proposed GNSO Council Agenda 13 August 2009
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:11:58 -0400
- In-reply-to: <E129E200EA6742FAA717E89FDEB35439@PSEVO>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D7AE0DAA5467@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org> <E129E200EA6742FAA717E89FDEB35439@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
While I appreciate the value of written status updates and agree that
it would be good to have them I wonder whether they actually will save
time.
For people who read them, it will give them a chance to think through
the status and have better questions - and this is a good effect. Yet
there will always be people who did not have a chance to read them, so
I believe we will still need to ask for a verbal report in most cases.
a.
On 10 Aug 2009, at 07:57, Philip Sheppard wrote:
In the interest of time could we pursue the suggestion of Chuck (not
for the
first time) that basic status reports are provided in advance of the
meeting in
writing and subject to a Q and A at the meeting if any one has a
question?
This would give time for the more pertinent updates on structure and
charters
which will need to be discussed.
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|