ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:14:21 -0700
  • Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acnq94TMPvNW5XzOSYiFJE1fPitIhAATuXJA
  • Thread-topic: Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel

[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]

News Alert

http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-10jun09-en.htm

________________________________
Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel

10 June 2008

A new public comment period opens today for 30 days on a proposed amendment 
from Tralliance to Appendix 6 and 7 of the dot-travel Registry Agreement.

On 18 May 2009, ICANN posted for public information a request submitted by 
Tralliance through the Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP). The request 
calls for a phased allocation process for one and two-character names in 
dot-travel.

The Tralliance proposal is available at 
http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/travel-18may09-en.pdf<http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/travel-18may09-en.pdf>.

As provided for by existing consensus policy 
(http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html), ICANN performed a 
preliminary review to determine whether the proposal might raise significant 
security, stability, or competition issues. ICANN's determination is that the 
proposal does not raise such issues.

[Note that, from 13 June to 13 July 2008, ICANN conducted a public comment 
forum on a proposed single-character second-level domain names allocation 
framework 
(http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/proposed-scsld-allocation-framework-13jun08.htm),
 which supported the allocation single-character second-level domain names in 
existing registries and reviewed various allocation methods.]

The proposal requires an amendment to the dot-travel Schedule of Reserved Names 
(Appendix 6) and a description of the phased allocation program is proposed to 
be inserted in Section 9 of Appendix 7. A copy of the proposed contract 
amendment is available 
here<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agreements/travel/proposed-amendment-10jun09.pdf>
 [PDF, 20K]. Comments on the proposed amendment may be submitted to 
tralliance-amendment at icann.org<mailto:tralliance-amendment@xxxxxxxxx> 
through 10 July 2009 23:59 UTC. Comments may be viewed at 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/tralliance-amendment/.

All documentation related to the Tralliance proposal is available at 
http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/#2009003.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>