<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 03:14:21 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acnq94TMPvNW5XzOSYiFJE1fPitIhAATuXJA
- Thread-topic: Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel
[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]
News Alert
http://www.icann.org/en/announcements/announcement-2-10jun09-en.htm
________________________________
Public Comment: One & Two-Character Names in dot-travel
10 June 2008
A new public comment period opens today for 30 days on a proposed amendment
from Tralliance to Appendix 6 and 7 of the dot-travel Registry Agreement.
On 18 May 2009, ICANN posted for public information a request submitted by
Tralliance through the Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP). The request
calls for a phased allocation process for one and two-character names in
dot-travel.
The Tralliance proposal is available at
http://www.icann.org/registries/rsep/travel-18may09-en.pdf<http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/travel-18may09-en.pdf>.
As provided for by existing consensus policy
(http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/rsep.html), ICANN performed a
preliminary review to determine whether the proposal might raise significant
security, stability, or competition issues. ICANN's determination is that the
proposal does not raise such issues.
[Note that, from 13 June to 13 July 2008, ICANN conducted a public comment
forum on a proposed single-character second-level domain names allocation
framework
(http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/proposed-scsld-allocation-framework-13jun08.htm),
which supported the allocation single-character second-level domain names in
existing registries and reviewed various allocation methods.]
The proposal requires an amendment to the dot-travel Schedule of Reserved Names
(Appendix 6) and a description of the phased allocation program is proposed to
be inserted in Section 9 of Appendix 7. A copy of the proposed contract
amendment is available
here<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agreements/travel/proposed-amendment-10jun09.pdf>
[PDF, 20K]. Comments on the proposed amendment may be submitted to
tralliance-amendment at icann.org<mailto:tralliance-amendment@xxxxxxxxx>
through 10 July 2009 23:59 UTC. Comments may be viewed at
http://forum.icann.org/lists/tralliance-amendment/.
All documentation related to the Tralliance proposal is available at
http://www.icann.org/en/registries/rsep/#2009003.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|