Re: [council] Regarding joint SO/AC initiatives

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for that explanation Bruce.

Just to be clear, my initial suggestion on the SO/AC sessions was not linked
to the other suggestions made by Avri. For me, they are different topics.

Thanks,

Stéphane


Le 28/05/09 13:36, « Bruce Tonkin » <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a
écrit :

> 
> Hello Stéphane,
> 
>> 
>> While I see the logic of what you are suggesting, I'm not
>> sure I understand
>> how you link that to the joint SO/AC sessions.
>> 
>> Forgive me if I simply misunderstood what you are saying, but are you
>> suggesting that these topics be handled in those sessions?
> 
> Actually I was suggesting that the joint public sessions that have been run so
> far - are good for speakers from each side expressing their points of view -
> but they don't help reach any consensus/compromise.  In fact they are probably
> better for discussing brand new policies where wide ranging views are useful
> at the beginning of a policy development exercise.   I was suggesting that to
> move forward on issues such as geographic names that you may consider a
> different approach of getting smaller working groups of experts together to
> consider the issues further.
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
>