ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: GNSO Council letter to the GAC

  • To: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] FW: GNSO Council letter to the GAC
  • From: Olga Cavalli <olgac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 10:55:21 -0300
  • Cc: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=vDvcnHDkLE0lW93BxohJu4oRjfsPHRWq9DfL6P57NS0=; b=dEJpAVAHKCKD+KbbO4ep1K/87LMJMK2HHqdYnsPHWv61U2vw/oVHjLcK2Y2WhIndYu PVT+BCAn+m+K5OjmetRsATLSVWG9rdoSlL8GWJoQzrP1Xuvh1UdlnO/2ZjYI2egQzYKf Sy227JkT1vnm5b0ogTyF1iVEw9mdcflIdOTzg=
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=He3OGvLdJfGWyJT6uBaPT8I35J9noZ+lExipe//QXyNXqyxZeknvKjPr4aCIAxf+fq 5/qlGHhdyMcZEM/BFPdNmvKaOHQln38SXISsawJM4iy5+HIkE5GX63Yl1UUvIvk6wxAY ijKB4IEhdiFU6SRbSi/2e1BPu/iASAH42TlaQ=
  • In-reply-to: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702A6A344@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <C6306261.14F3A%stephane.vangelder@indom.com> <C630678D.14F42%stephane.vangelder@indom.com> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF0702A6A344@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Also for me Stephane,
thanks, regards
Olga

2009/5/13 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

>
> Thanks Stephane.  It looks fine to me.
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:03 AM
> > To: Council GNSO
> > Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Council letter to the GAC
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Here is the modified draft. I have included Chuck's mods and
> > simply deleted the paragraph on reserved lists, which is
> > obviously causing too many problems at this time.
> >
> > I hope this version and this attempt at compromise can elicit
> > the support of the BC and the IPC so that we can have a
> > coordinated response to the GAC letter.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Stéphane
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>