ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] FW: GNSO Council letter to the GAC

  • To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] FW: GNSO Council letter to the GAC
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 09:37:43 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <C630678D.14F42%stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <C6306261.14F3A%stephane.vangelder@indom.com> <C630678D.14F42%stephane.vangelder@indom.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcnTrU9MChMfsV+6iUCEOymq8LQmoQAAaj4tAADFceQAB3hpYA==
  • Thread-topic: [council] FW: GNSO Council letter to the GAC
Thanks Stephane.  It looks fine to me.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:03 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] FW: GNSO Council letter to the GAC
> 
> All,
> 
> Here is the modified draft. I have included Chuck's mods and 
> simply deleted the paragraph on reserved lists, which is 
> obviously causing too many problems at this time.
> 
> I hope this version and this attempt at compromise can elicit 
> the support of the BC and the IPC so that we can have a 
> coordinated response to the GAC letter.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Stéphane
> 
> 
> 
>
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>