<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] FW: Doodle IDNG call
- To: <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] FW: Doodle IDNG call
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 09:13:14 -0400
- In-reply-to: <1241525706.7803.7450.camel@bower>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <C625C8F5.13E86%stephane.vangelder@indom.com> <1241525706.7803.7450.camel@bower>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcnNe9J3ob9uyVL/Qja0mjTMkEEPeQAB1LMg
- Thread-topic: [council] FW: Doodle IDNG call
Sounds like a good OSC GNSO Ops team topic to me. I will forward this exchange
to Ray Fassett, the chair of that WT.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 8:15 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] FW: Doodle IDNG call
>
>
> On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 10:44 +0200, Stéphane Van Gelder wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps we could start a WG on this topic, first meetings scheduled
> > for 3 to 7am next Wednesday everyone (a joke of course).
> >
>
> a joke yes, but it made me wonder whether there is an appropriate OSC
> Work Team that is including this challenge among it other
> organizational
> challenges.
>
> Personally I have alwasy been in favor of rotating meetings, but I by
> and largely willing to deal with meetings in the middle of the night -
> my personal difficult zone being 0400 - 0600. but I know that not all
> people can rotate their schedules that way.
>
> a.
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|