RE: [council] Council Liaison to RAP WG

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Mike & Tim,

As long as there is no objection from other council members, I think
this works well.

thanks

a.


On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:59 -0700, Tim Ruiz wrote:
> Avri/Mike,
> 
> I volunteer to take up the liaison role for the IRTP-WG.
> 
> Tim  
>  
>   -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RE: [council] Council Liaison to RAP WG
> From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thu, March 26, 2009 10:51 am
> To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'"
> <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> Thanks Avri, I agree. I would volunteer to liase on this RAP-WG and the
> Fast Flux WG since there is overlap between them, and I would resign as
> liason to the IRTP-WG if there is another volunteer. 
> 
> 
> Mike Rodenbaugh
> Rodenbaugh Law
> 548 Market Street
> San Francisco, CA 94104
> +1.415.738.8087
> www.rodenbaugh.com
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On
> Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:11 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Council Liaison to RAP WG
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> While I have no doubt as to Mike's capabilities, I for one would like to
> see
> these duties spread out a bit more. Mike is currently Liaison for 2
> groups
> already.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 26 Mar 2009, at 11:03, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> 
> > All,
> >
> > In light of my IRT participant responsibilities, I can no longer serve 
> > as Council liaison to the RAP WG. I know that Mike Rodenbaugh is a 
> > member of the RAP WG and believe that he would do an excellent job as 
> > liaison. I suggest we ask him to take on that role.
> >
> > K
> >
> 
> 
>