<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Council Liaison to RAP WG
- To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [council] Council Liaison to RAP WG
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Mar 2009 08:59:49 -0700
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 5.0.7
Avri/Mike,
I volunteer to take up the liaison role for the IRTP-WG.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] Council Liaison to RAP WG
From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, March 26, 2009 10:51 am
To: "'Avri Doria'" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "'Council GNSO'"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Avri, I agree. I would volunteer to liase on this RAP-WG and the
Fast Flux WG since there is overlap between them, and I would resign as
liason to the IRTP-WG if there is another volunteer.
Mike Rodenbaugh
Rodenbaugh Law
548 Market Street
San Francisco, CA 94104
+1.415.738.8087
www.rodenbaugh.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, March 26, 2009 8:11 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Council Liaison to RAP WG
Hi,
While I have no doubt as to Mike's capabilities, I for one would like to
see
these duties spread out a bit more. Mike is currently Liaison for 2
groups
already.
a.
On 26 Mar 2009, at 11:03, Rosette, Kristina wrote:
> All,
>
> In light of my IRT participant responsibilities, I can no longer serve
> as Council liaison to the RAP WG. I know that Mike Rodenbaugh is a
> member of the RAP WG and believe that he would do an excellent job as
> liaison. I suggest we ask him to take on that role.
>
> K
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|