RE: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I was not suggesting anything about how the funds would be used but only
that the additional information could be helpful for constituencies to
have in making any decisions regarding the use of the funds. 

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:59 PM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I am not sure what productive purpose such a exercise would achieve.
> Are you suggesting that the money should be distributed 
> according to donation proportionality?  I  think that might 
> be counter-productive especially when what I was hoping to 
> achieve was sufficient funds for all constituencies to send 
> their participants to Sydney.
> 
> I did not get the impression that proportional distribution 
> was the motivation behind Phillip's comment.  Rather I 
> understood him to be pointing to the fact that the BC, 
> coincidentally along with the NCUC, and ISPC could, at the 
> moment only provide support for 1 participant in Sydney. 
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 14:39 -0400, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > I wouldn't think it would be that difficult to go back and find out 
> > what the various constituencies contributed to the fund.  
> As I recall 
> > various constituencies did not contribute the same amounts 
> and I think 
> > that they may like to know that information before making a 
> decision 
> > on how the funds are used.  Philip's comment caused me to 
> think in that direction:
> > "As much of this money came from the BC in the first place, I find 
> > this a positive suggestion."
> > 
> > Chuck
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 2:05 PM
> > > To: GNSO Council
> > > Subject: RE: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Are you suggesting we do such historical digging?  I am 
> not sure to 
> > > what purpose.  Are you suggesting we subdivide it according to 
> > > contribution?
> > > I would find that difficult and possibly quite 
> contentious at this 
> > > point.
> > > 
> > > a.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 09:50 -0400, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > > > Would it be possible to prepare a brief report that shows
> > > the source
> > > > of the funds by constituency as well as the total funds 
> available?
> > > > 
> > > > Chuck
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > > > > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:33 AM
> > > > > To: GNSO Council
> > > > > Subject: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > I was wondering whether there would be general support in the 
> > > > > council for using the monies in this account to 
> supplement the 
> > > > > travel budget to Sydney and to Seoul in order to allow
> > > all current
> > > > > constituencies who wish to send 3 participants 
> (Councilors, WG 
> > > > > participants, SC ...) .
> > > > > 
> > > > > While we are asking for better funding in future 
> years, we can 
> > > > > be fairly certain that we will not get a raise in support
> > > for 2009.  It
> > > > > may make sense to use these funds for that purpose - 
> i have been 
> > > > > asked why we are holding on to the money in a time when
> > > we need more
> > > > > support.
> > > > > 
> > > > > If there is general support, I would like to ask  the
> > > Travel DT to
> > > > > figure out how to make this allocation and then to bring
> > > a motion to
> > > > > the council.
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks
> > > > > 
> > > > > a.
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
>