ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.

  • To: <avri@xxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 14:39:37 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <1237831477.8123.1144.camel@bower>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <1237807974.8123.1052.camel@bower> <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07029A0693@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <1237831477.8123.1144.camel@bower>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acmr4q8G7ICZz2oTQYmAeaip9fCAwwAA05Sg
  • Thread-topic: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.

I wouldn't think it would be that difficult to go back and find out what
the various constituencies contributed to the fund.  As I recall various
constituencies did not contribute the same amounts and I think that they
may like to know that information before making a decision on how the
funds are used.  Philip's comment caused me to think in that direction:
"As much of this money came from the BC in the first place, I find this
a positive suggestion."

Chuck

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 2:05 PM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: RE: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.
> 
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Are you suggesting we do such historical digging?  I am not 
> sure to what purpose.  Are you suggesting we subdivide it 
> according to contribution?
> I would find that difficult and possibly quite contentious at 
> this point.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> On Mon, 2009-03-23 at 09:50 -0400, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> > Would it be possible to prepare a brief report that shows 
> the source 
> > of the funds by constituency as well as the total funds available?
> > 
> > Chuck
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> > > Sent: Monday, March 23, 2009 7:33 AM
> > > To: GNSO Council
> > > Subject: [council] Old DNSO funds and this year's travel.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I was wondering whether there would be general support in the 
> > > council for using the monies in this account to supplement the 
> > > travel budget to Sydney and to Seoul in order to allow 
> all current 
> > > constituencies who wish to send 3 participants (Councilors, WG 
> > > participants, SC ...) .
> > > 
> > > While we are asking for better funding in future years, we can be 
> > > fairly certain that we will not get a raise in support 
> for 2009.  It 
> > > may make sense to use these funds for that purpose - i have been 
> > > asked why we are holding on to the money in a time when 
> we need more 
> > > support.
> > > 
> > > If there is general support, I would like to ask  the 
> Travel DT to 
> > > figure out how to make this allocation and then to bring 
> a motion to 
> > > the council.
> > > 
> > > thanks
> > > 
> > > a.
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>