Re: [council] IDN gTLD Fast Track discussion

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Edmon,

Would it not be difficult to argue for an IDN gTLD fast track if no such
mechanism is also planned for other non-contentious subcategories of new
TLDs?

There was a lot of discussion on the possibility of increasing the number of
TLD categories in Mexico and my feeling was that staff wasn't in favour. I
could be wrong of course...

I actually think it makes a lot of sense to allow non-contentious TLDs a way
forward before the mainstream new TLD launch, if it means TLDs that present
more complicated issues get ironed out properly while at the same time not
delaying the others.

Thanks,

Stéphane Van Gelder


Le 19/03/09 12:17, « Edmon Chung » <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> Hi Everyone,
> 
> Following up on the discussion we had during our wrap up meeting in Mexico,
> would like to share some thoughts on a possible IDN gTLD Fast Track concept.
> From the discussion at that meeting as well as conversations during and after
> Mexico, it seems like there are a few items that could form a starting point
> for constructive discussion towards a possible IDN gTLD Fast Track:
> 
> 1. The New gTLD schedule should not be delayed by an IDN gTLD Fast Track
> 2. The IDN ccTLD Fast Track schedule should not be delayed by an IDN gTLD Fast
> Track
> 3. An IDN gTLD Fast Track should be viewed as a backup plan should the New
> gTLD schedule be further delayed
> 4. Work on an IDN gTLD Fast Track should begin in preparation for the case
> that the New gTLD schedule is further delayed
> 5. The IDN gTLD Fast Track, if implemented, should:
>             - follow closely the process of the IDN ccTLD Fast Track
>             - aim to introduce "a limited number of non-contentious" IDN gTLDs
>             - be based on the GNSO New gTLD Final Report, including the IDN WG
> outcomes report
> (i.e. should not require additional policy development)
>             - encourage stronger protection of rights of others
> 
> I think we would be allocating some time to discuss the issue in our upcoming
> conference call meeting.  Would love to get some feedback and thoughts on the
> above items before our meeting.
> 
> Wondering what people think about the above points...
> 
> Edmon
> 
> 
> 
>