<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] GNSO Council resolution 19 February 2009
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] GNSO Council resolution 19 February 2009
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:49:07 -0800
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcmS04VCDUv5agWpSBuU+q7koCad3wAD/Yjg
- Thread-topic: GNSO Council resolution 19 February 2009
Dear Council Members,
Ahead of the complete minutes please find the resolution that was passed at the
GNSO Council meeting on 19 February 2009.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
MOTION on Registration Abuse Policies Charter
================================================
Proposed by Kristina Rosette
Seconded by Mike Rodenbaugh
Whereas GNSO Council Resolution (20081218-3) dated December 18, 2008 called for
the creation of a drafting team "to create a proposed charter for a working
group to investigate the open issues documented in the issues report on
Registrations[sic] Abuse Policy".
Whereas a drafting team has formed and its members have discussed and reviewed
the open issues documented in the issues report.
Whereas it is the view of the drafting Team that the objective of the Working
Group should be to gather facts, define terms, provide the appropriate focus
and definition of the policy issue(s), if any, to be addressed, in order to
enable the GNSO Council to make an informed decision as to whether to launch
PDP on registration abuse.
Whereas the drafting team recommends that the GNSO Council charter a Working
Group to (i) further define and research the issues outlined in the
Registration Abuse Policies Issues Report; and (ii) take the steps outlined
below. The Working Group should complete its work before a decision is taken by
the GNSO Council on whether to launch a PDP.
The GNSO Council RESOLVES:
To form a Working Group of interested stakeholders and Constituency
representatives, to collaborate broadly with knowledgeable individuals and
organizations, to further define and research the issues outlined in the
Registration Abuse Policies Issues Report; and take the steps outlined in the
Charter. The Working Group should address the issues outlined in the Charter
and report back to the GNSO Council within 90 days following the end of the
ICANN meeting in Mexico City.
CHARTER
Scope and definition of registration abuse - the Working Group should define
domain name registration abuse, as distinct from abuse arising solely from use
of a domain name while it is registered. The Working Group should also identify
which aspects of the subject of registration abuse are within ICANN's mission
to address and which are within the set of topics on which ICANN may establish
policies that are binding on gTLD registry operators and ICANN-accredited
registrars. This task should include an illustrative categorization of known
abuses.
Additional research and identifying concrete policy issues - The issues report
outlines a number of areas where additional research would be needed in order
to understand what problems may exist in relation to registration abuse and
their scope, and to fully appreciate the current practices of contracted
parties, including research to:
'Understand if registration abuses are occurring that might be curtailed or
better addressed if consistent registration abuse policies were established'
'Determine if and how [registration] abuse is dealt with in those registries
[and registrars] that do not have any specific [policies] in place'
'Identify how these registration abuse provisions are [...] implemented in
practice or deemed effective in addressing registration abuse'.
In addition, additional research should be conducted to include the practices
of relevant entities other than the contracted parties, such as abusers,
registrants, law enforcement, service providers, and so on.
The Working Group should determine how this research can be conducted in a
timely and efficient manner -- by the Working Group itself via a Request for
Information (RFI), by obtaining expert advice, and/or by exploring other
options.
Based on the additional research and information, the Working Group should
identify and recommend specific policy issues and processes for further
consideration by the GNSO Council.
SSAC Participation and Collaboration
The Working Group should (i) consider inviting a representative from the
Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) to participate in the Working
Group; (ii) consider in further detail the SSAC's invitation to the GNSO
Council to participate in a collaborative effort on abuse contacts; and (iii)
make a recommendation to the Council about this invitation.
Workshop at ICANN meeting in Mexico City on Registration Abuse Policies - In
order to get broad input on and understanding of the specific nature of
concerns from community stakeholders, the drafting team proposes to organize a
workshop on registration abuse policies in conjunction with the ICANN meeting
in Mexico City. The Working Group should review and take into account the
discussions and recommendations, if any, from this workshop in its
deliberations.
The working group established by this motion will work according to the process
defined in working_group_process.
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?working_group_process
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|