<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Today's motion on a WG charter on Registration Abuse Policies Charter
- To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Today's motion on a WG charter on Registration Abuse Policies Charter
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:02:13 +0100
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: avri@xxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
In reading the motion before the meting, it seems that one thing is
missing fro that charter and that is the working rules. since we do not
have a standard set worked out by the PPSC WG work team yet, we have
been including them explicitly in every charter.
I have pulled the set of process we used from the IRTP Part A charter
and put them on a wiki page.
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?working_group_process
would the following be acceptable as a friendly amendment:
As a last line add.
The working group established by this motion will work according to the
process defined in
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?working_group_process.
thanks
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|