ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Today's motion on a WG charter on Registration Abuse Policies Charter

  • To: GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Today's motion on a WG charter on Registration Abuse Policies Charter
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 19:02:13 +0100
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: avri@xxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi,

In reading the motion before the meting, it seems that one thing is
missing fro that charter and that is the working rules.  since we do not
have a standard set worked out by the PPSC WG work team yet, we have
been including them explicitly in every charter.


I have pulled the set of process we used from the IRTP Part A charter
and put them on a wiki page.

https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?working_group_process


would the following be acceptable as a friendly amendment:

As a last line add.

The working group established by this motion will work according to the
process defined in
https://st.icann.org/gnso-council/index.cgi?working_group_process.

thanks
a.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>