RE: [council] New gTLD Motion 3 Edits?

["Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

I second this motion.

Tim 

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] New gTLD Motion 3 Edits?
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, December 30, 2008 1:11 pm
To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

The following motion was tabled in our 18 Dec 08 Council meeting to
allow for some wording edits that a couple people volunteered to submit.
 This is just a reminder for those who were planning to suggest edits.
 
Chuck
 
Motion 3 (tabled until 8 January meeting)Made by: Chuck Gomes 
Seconded: Adrain Kinderis
Whereas both the GNSO and ccNSO are anticipating implementation of
processes to introduce IDN TLDs in 2009,
Resolve
1) the GNSO Council strongly believes that neither the New gTLD or
ccTLD fast track process should result in IDN TLDs in the root before
the other unless both the GNSO and ccNSO so agree, and
2) fast track IDN ccTLDs should not be entered into the root if they do
not have an enforceable commitment to do the following as gTLDs must
do: i) follow minimal security and stability requirements, IDN
Guidelines and IDN standards;
ii) pay ICANN fees sufficient to ensure that IDN ccTLDs are fully
self-funding and are not cross-subsidized by other ICANN activities.