RE: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new gTLD process

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Does it really matter? I think our goal would be to try to reach rough
consensus on a possible GNSO statement.  By now, I think those of us who
have been involved for awhile, pretty much know the interests of one
another.

I submitted quite a few comments and was also involved in comments
submitted by the RyC.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 5:26 PM
> To: Avri Doria; Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new 
> gTLD process
> 
> 
> What's our plan w/r/t Council members who wrote or submitted 
> comments or whose employers submitted comments?  Recusal from 
> discussion of those specific comments?  Disclosure alone is 
> sufficient?
> 
> K 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 12:52 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new 
> gTLD process
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for forwardng this pointer.
> 
> After reading this and some of the other comments, and given 
> that we have not done much on an organized response yet, it 
> occurs to me that we should schedule a special meeting just 
> to discuss comments and response to the new gTLD implementation plan.
> 
> Unless there is strong objection, I will ask Glen to try and 
> find a time for early next year.
> 
> In the meantime, anyone who is interested in working on a 
> drafting effort to initiate something over the holiday period 
> is invited to volunteer.
> 
> I will volunteer.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 20 Dec 2008, at 06:00, Alan Greenberg wrote:
> 
> >
> > Sorry - forgot the link -
> > http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00175.html
> > .
> > ----------------
> >
> > If you haven't seen them, the DOC/NTIA and Department of Justice 
> > Antitrust Division comments make interesting reading.
> >
> > Alan
> >
> >
> >
> 
> 
>