ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new gTLD process

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new gTLD process
  • From: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 17:26:06 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <6928FC59-1880-4B59-995E-03E3E122FB18@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcliZ0VxA3hfD6LkRYCdxhTycH09/ACHMM4A
  • Thread-topic: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new gTLD process

What's our plan w/r/t Council members who wrote or submitted comments or
whose employers submitted comments?  Recusal from discussion of those
specific comments?  Disclosure alone is sufficient?

K 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Saturday, December 20, 2008 12:52 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Corrected: US DOC/NTIA comments on new gTLD
process


Hi,

Thanks for forwardng this pointer.

After reading this and some of the other comments, and given that we
have not done much on an organized response yet, it occurs to me that we
should schedule a special meeting just to discuss comments and response
to the new gTLD implementation plan.

Unless there is strong objection, I will ask Glen to try and find a time
for early next year.

In the meantime, anyone who is interested in working on a drafting
effort to initiate something over the holiday period is invited to
volunteer.

I will volunteer.

Thanks,

a.




On 20 Dec 2008, at 06:00, Alan Greenberg wrote:

>
> Sorry - forgot the link - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/gtld-guide/msg00175.html
> .
> ----------------
>
> If you haven't seen them, the DOC/NTIA and Department of Justice 
> Antitrust Division comments make interesting reading.
>
> Alan
>
>
>





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>