Re: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments

[Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you Philip.

I would second such a motion. May I suggest that we simplify things and
leave out the first paragraph?

May I suggest adding a date in the second paragraph, i.e. staff must
nominate a fixed sum by mid Jan (just an example, I have no idea if that
date is feasible)? This so that we move forward long enough before the first
ICANN meeting of 2009 so that both staff and constituencies have the time to
make their arrangements.

Thanks,

Stéphane


Le 18/12/08 15:16, « Philip Sheppard » <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx> a écrit :

> 
> 
> Alternate motion for travel.
> Proposed
> Philip
> Stephane - would you second ?
> --------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> Whereas:
> Council welcomes the fact that ICANN have allocated some funds for GNSO
> travel.
> 
> 1. Council regrets that the current proposal imposes administrative difficulty
> and will thus
> detract from the total budget available if some budget will be needed to cover
> staff
> administration costs.
> 
> 2. Council calls upon ICANN staff to nominate a fixed sum in 2009  that will
> be granted to
> each of the constituencies currently recognised under the ICANN by-laws of 29
> May 2008. 
> Such sum should exclude any budget to cover the costs of nom com delegates or
> GNSO chair
> travel.
> 
> 3. Council requests Constituencies to publish the names of all those who
> receive travel
> support together with a list of the relevant meeting(s) for which the support
> was given and
> which were attended by the support recipient.
> 
> 
>