ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments

  • To: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:16:07 -0500
  • In-reply-to: <25BDBB9029E94E28AB52640D6A3AAA5C@PSEVO>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <494A2145.80904@domini.cat> <C57013C4.29D6%stephane.vangelder@indom.com> <25BDBB9029E94E28AB52640D6A3AAA5C@PSEVO>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AclhF581pgNpKOuxzUeE52bh2ddUSQAANOIgAAClC+A=
  • Thread-topic: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
We probably should confirm with Doug whether Staff will handle it that
way if it does not come out to even head counts for airfare and/or per
diem per constiutency?
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
        Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2008 8:58 AM
        To: 'Council GNSO'
        Subject: [council] Travel policy draft and other comments
        
        

        Stephane wrote:
        So if that's the case why not just stick with the "we have a
total amount X for travel support for the GNSO and we divide that by the
number of constituencies"?
        
        
        I agree 100%.
        
        Philip
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>