ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
  • From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:10:31 -0700
  • Cc: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.14.14

Thanks Avri. Now I recall. We used 0 for no opinion. Didn't seem to make
much sense to express a constintuency opinion on that if our postion was
for no studies.

Tim 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, December 16, 2008 11:53 am
To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



On 16 Dec 2008, at 18:40, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> what does zero (0) feasibility mean?


by the values i suggested,

0 feasibility means that they either have no view on its feasibility 
or don't know.
1 mean one believes it is.
-1 means one believes it isn't

a.








<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>