<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:10:31 -0700
- Cc: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.14.14
Thanks Avri. Now I recall. We used 0 for no opinion. Didn't seem to make
much sense to express a constintuency opinion on that if our postion was
for no studies.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, December 16, 2008 11:53 am
To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On 16 Dec 2008, at 18:40, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> what does zero (0) feasibility mean?
by the values i suggested,
0 feasibility means that they either have no view on its feasibility
or don't know.
1 mean one believes it is.
-1 means one believes it isn't
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|