<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
- To: "Gomes,Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
- From: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 10:58:57 -0700
- Cc: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.14.14
I don't know. We didn't really try to figure that out. Perhaps NA (Not
applicable) would be a better representation for feasibility, given our
position.
Tim
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: RE: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, December 16, 2008 11:40 am
To: "Tim Ruiz" <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks Tim. One question: what does zero (0) feasibility mean?
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tim Ruiz
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 11:44 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] RrC Entries on the Priorities spreadsheet
>
> Attached. I also uploaded it to the Wiki site, but not sure
> if that was useful or not.
>
> Tim
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|