RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments

["Mike Rodenbaugh" <icann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

As a start, attached are the BC's comments from August.  Perhaps Staff
and/or the Registrar reps could explain how our comments, or any other
public comments, have been incorporated into the RAA Amendments proposal
since then?  Other constituencies may also feel that their comments have
been completely ignored.

Thanks,
Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 9:18 AM
To: Avri Doria; Liz Gasster
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments


I hope we can at least get some details about which of the amendments
people are concerned with.  I am having trouble understanding which of
them would not be better than what we have now.  If I am wrong, fine.
But if I am not, I think we should quit delaying.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2008 11:23 AM
> To: Liz Gasster
> Cc: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks Liz.
> 
> I think that at this point it might make sense to postpone 
> the vote on the RAA from this week's meeting and to include 
> some explanation on  
> these amendments.    I will try to adjust the timings on the various  
> meeting topics accordingly.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 15 Dec 2008, at 16:43, Liz Gasster wrote:
> 
> >
> > Chuck and all,
> >
> > In addition to being an update with more detail than was previously 
> > provided, this is the written report detailed in the current RAA 
> > process for amendments in subsection 4.3.1 
> > (http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm#4.3.1
> > ).  Services staff wanted to make sure this information was 
> available 
> > to the GNSO before it considered a vote on the RAA amendments.
> >
> > Most notably, it also contains two new proposed amendments 
> that arose 
> > from the latest public comment period and subsequent community 
> > dialogue.  One of these enhances the licensee provision and 
> the other 
> > requires registrars to post their current email and mailing 
> address on 
> > their websites.
> >
> > Please let me know if you have any other questions.
> >
> > Thanks, Liz
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 6:50 AM
> > To: Liz Gasster; Council GNSO
> > Subject: RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments
> >
> > Thanks Liz. What was updated?
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
> >> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:01 PM
> >> To: Council GNSO
> >> Subject: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments
> >> Importance: High
> >>
> >> All,
> >>
> >> Attached please find an updated report from Services on 
> the pending 
> >> amendments to the RAA.  This report updates and expands on 
> the paper 
> >> sent on 29 October 2008.
> >>
> >> Thanks, Liz
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
>