Re: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Thanks Liz.

I think that at this point it might make sense to postpone the vote on  
the RAA from this week's meeting and to include some explanation on  
these amendments.    I will try to adjust the timings on the various  
meeting topics accordingly.
a.



On 15 Dec 2008, at 16:43, Liz Gasster wrote:

> Chuck and all,
>
> In addition to being an update with more detail than was previously  
> provided, this is the written report detailed in the current RAA  
> process for amendments in subsection 4.3.1 (http://www.icann.org/en/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm#4.3.1 
> ).  Services staff wanted to make sure this information was  
> available to the GNSO before it considered a vote on the RAA  
> amendments.
> Most notably, it also contains two new proposed amendments that  
> arose from the latest public comment period and subsequent community  
> dialogue.  One of these enhances the licensee provision and the  
> other requires registrars to post their current email and mailing  
> address on their websites.
> Please let me know if you have any other questions.
>
> Thanks, Liz
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 6:50 AM
> To: Liz Gasster; Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments
>
> Thanks Liz. What was updated?
>
> Chuck
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Liz Gasster
> > Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 9:01 PM
> > To: Council GNSO
> > Subject: [council] Revised Report on RAA amendments
> > Importance: High
> >
> > All,
> >
> > Attached please find an updated report from Services on the
> > pending amendments to the RAA.  This report updates and
> > expands on the paper sent on 29 October 2008.
> >
> > Thanks, Liz